Predicted by Orwell: A discourse on the gradual shift in electronic surveillance law
Scott McLachlan

TL;DR
This paper examines the historical and legislative evolution of electronic surveillance laws across three countries, revealing a gradual weakening of protections and a shift towards increased state surveillance, reflecting Orwellian themes.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of legislative changes in electronic surveillance laws, highlighting the trend of expanding state powers at the expense of individual rights.
Findings
Legislative protections peaked before gradually weakening.
Technological advancements have hindered legitimate investigations.
Recent laws have expanded state surveillance powers.
Abstract
At some point in the history of most nations, one or more events of illegal electronic surveillance by those in power or law enforcement has occurred that has the effect of setting State against Citizen. The media sensationalise these incidents for profit, however they more often correctly express the concern felt by the general public. At these times politicians rise, either into fame or infamy, by proposing new legislation which the public is told will protect them by from future incidents of illegal and unwarranted invasion by officers of the state. Two things have occurred since these protective laws were enacted; technological advancement that is claimed has frustrated legitimate investigation, and changes in the law that are ostensibly presented as intending to facilitate the prosecution or prevention of a publicly decried offence, like child pornography, but which in context…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, Rights, and Freedoms
