Estimating Scale Discrepancy in Bayesian Model Calibration for ChemCam on the Mars Curiosity Rover
K. Sham Bhat, Kary Myers, Earl Lawrence, James Colgan, Elizabeth Judge

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian calibration method that accounts for scale discrepancies in ChemCam LIBS data on Mars, improving the accuracy of physical parameter estimation.
Contribution
It presents a novel application of Bayesian model calibration incorporating a structured discrepancy model for ChemCam LIBS data analysis.
Findings
Effective discrepancy modeling improves calibration accuracy
Demonstrates systematic differences between simulated and observed spectra
Provides a general approach for theory-observation systematic differences
Abstract
The Mars rover Curiosity carries an instrument called ChemCam to determine the composition of the soil and rocks. ChemCam uses laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for this purpose. Los Alamos National Laboratory has developed a simulation capability that can predict spectra from ChemCam, but there are major scale differences between the prediction and observation. This presents a challenge when using Bayesian model calibration to determine the unknown physical parameters that describe the LIBS observations. We present an analysis of LIBS data to support ChemCam based on including a structured discrepancy model in a Bayesian model calibration scheme. This is both a novel application of Bayesian model calibration and a general purpose approach to accounting for such systematic differences between theory and observation in this setting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
