New Opportunities for the Formal Proof of Computational Real Geometry?
Erika {\'A}brah\'am, James Davenport, Matthew England, Gereon Kremer,, and Zak Tonks

TL;DR
This paper investigates the potential for formal, machine-verifiable proofs in real algebraic geometry, proposing a new algorithm that could improve the traceability and verifiability of computational results.
Contribution
It introduces a novel algorithm based on Cylindrical Algebraic Coverings aimed at enhancing formal proof capabilities in real algebraic geometry.
Findings
Proposes a new algorithm for satisfiability over the reals.
Suggests this algorithm offers better traceability for formal verification.
Highlights potential for more reliable machine-verifiable proofs.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the question "to what extent could we produce formal, machine-verifiable, proofs in real algebraic geometry?" The question has been asked before but as yet the leading algorithms for answering such questions have not been formalised. We present a thesis that a new algorithm for ascertaining satisfiability of formulae over the reals via Cylindrical Algebraic Coverings [\'{A}brah\'{a}m, Davenport, England, Kremer, \emph{Deciding the Consistency of Non-Linear Real Arithmetic Constraints with a Conflict Driver Search Using Cylindrical Algebraic Coverings}, 2020] might provide trace and outputs that allow the results to be more susceptible to machine verification than those of competing algorithms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Polynomial and algebraic computation
