Revisiting the Common Neighbour Analysis and the Centrosymmetry Parameter
Peter M Larsen

TL;DR
This paper reviews and improves two widely used methods for structural classification in crystalline simulations, enhancing their robustness and interpretability through proposed modifications.
Contribution
It introduces modified variants of Common Neighbour Analysis and Centrosymmetry Parameter that address their failure modes and biases.
Findings
Modified methods show improved robustness.
Enhanced interpretability of structural classification.
Broader applicability in crystalline simulations.
Abstract
We review two standard methods for structural classification in simulations of crystalline phases, the Common Neighbour Analysis and the Centrosymmetry Parameter. We explore the definitions and implementations of each of their common variants, and investigate their respective failure modes and classification biases. Simple modifications to both methods are proposed, which improve their robustness, interpretability, and applicability. We denote these variants the Interval Common Neighbour Analysis, and the Minimum-Weight Matching Centrosymmetry Parameter.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph theory and applications
