Are You Satisfied by This Partial Assignment?
Roberto Sebastiani

TL;DR
This paper examines the concept of partial-assignment satisfiability in complex formulas, highlighting ambiguities and their implications for improving enumeration algorithms in SAT-related problems.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of partial-assignment satisfiability, especially for non-CNF and quantified formulas, addressing ambiguities and practical impacts.
Findings
Identifies ambiguities in partial-assignment satisfiability
Analyzes implications for non-CNF and quantified formulas
Suggests directions for developing better enumeration algorithms
Abstract
Many procedures for SAT and SAT-related problems -- in particular for those requiring the complete enumeration of satisfying truth assignments -- rely their efficiency on the detection of partial assignments satisfying an input formula. In this paper we analyze the notion of partial-assignment satisfiability -- in particular when dealing with non-CNF and existentially-quantified formulas -- raising a flag about the ambiguities and subtleties of this concept, and investigating their practical consequences. This may drive the development of more effective assignment-enumeration algorithms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFormal Methods in Verification · Logic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
