Airline Crew Pairing Optimization Framework for Large Networks with Multiple Crew Bases and Hub-and-Spoke Subnetworks

TL;DR

This paper introduces AirCROP, a new framework for airline crew pairing optimization that effectively handles large, complex networks with multiple bases and subnetworks, improving upon traditional methods.

Contribution

The paper presents a novel heuristic-based optimization framework, AirCROP, designed for large-scale, complex airline networks, addressing limitations of existing column generation approaches.

Findings

Successfully applied to networks with over 4200 flights and 15 crew bases.

Demonstrated robustness to variability and initialization methods.

Achieved cost-effective crew pairings in complex network scenarios.

Abstract

Crew Pairing Optimization aims at generating a set of flight sequences (crew pairings), covering all flights in an airline's flight schedule, at minimum cost, while satisfying several legality constraints. CPO is critically important for airlines' business viability, considering that the crew operating cost is their second-largest expense. It poses an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem, to tackle which, the state-of-the-art relies on relaxing the underlying Integer Programming Problem (IPP) into a Linear Programming Problem (LPP), solving the latter through Column Generation (CG) technique, and integerization of the resulting LPP solution. However, with the growing scale and complexity of the flight networks (those with a large number of flights, multiple crew bases and/or multiple hub-and-spoke subnetworks), the utility of the conventional CG-practices has become questionable. This paper proposed an Airline Crew Pairing Optimization Framework, AirCROP, whose constitutive modules include the Legal Crew Pairing Generator, Initial Feasible Solution Generator, and an Optimization Engine built on heuristic-based CG-implementation. In this paper, besides the design of AirCROP's modules, insights into important questions related to how these modules interact, which the literature is otherwise silent on, have been shared. These relate to the sensitivity of AirCROP's performance towards: sources of variability over multiple runs for a given problem, initialization method, and termination parameters for LPP-solutioning and IPP-solutioning. The efficacy of the AirCROP has been demonstrated on real-world large-scale and complex flight networks (with over 4200 flights, 15 crew bases, and billion-plus pairings). It is hoped that with the emergence of such complex flight networks, this paper shall serve as an important milestone for affiliated research and applications.