How to choose the most appropriate centrality measure? A decision tree approach
Pavel Chebotarev, Dmitry Gubanov

TL;DR
This paper introduces the culling method, a decision tree approach for selecting the most appropriate centrality measure in network analysis, reducing complexity and providing deeper insights into measure behaviors.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel culling method that efficiently distinguishes among 40 centrality measures using minimal simple graphs, enhancing measure selection without extensive data or models.
Findings
Only 13 small graphs distinguish all 40 measures.
The method reduces the set of measures using simple axioms.
Insights into measures like PageRank and Bridging are provided.
Abstract
Centrality metrics play a crucial role in network analysis, while the choice of specific measures significantly influences the accuracy of conclusions as each measure represents a unique concept of node importance. Among over 400 proposed indices, selecting the most suitable ones for specific applications remains a challenge. Existing approaches -- model-based, data-driven, and axiomatic -- have limitations, requiring association with models, training datasets, or restrictive axioms for each specific application. To address this, we introduce the culling method, which relies on the expert concept of centrality behavior on simple graphs. The culling method involves forming a set of candidate measures, generating a list of as small graphs as possible needed to distinguish the measures from each other, constructing a decision-tree survey, and identifying the measure consistent with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · Mental Health Research Topics
