Fake Review Detection Using Behavioral and Contextual Features
Jay Kumar

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of behavioral and contextual features, especially reviewer deviation and text similarity measures, in improving the accuracy of fake review detection models on real-world datasets.
Contribution
The study introduces the use of reviewer deviation and compares text similarity schemes, demonstrating their importance and impact on fake review classification performance.
Findings
Reviewer deviation is a significant feature for fake review detection.
Scaling datasets improves classification recall and accuracy.
BM25 term weighting scheme outperforms others in text similarity measurement.
Abstract
User reviews reflect significant value of product in the world of e-market. Many firms or product providers hire spammers for misleading new customers by posting spam reviews. There are three types of fake reviews, untruthful reviews, brand reviews and non-reviews. All three types mislead the new customers. A multinomial organization "Yelp" is separating fake reviews from non-fake reviews since last decade. However, there are many e-commerce sites which do not filter fake and non-fake reviews separately. Automatic fake review detection is focused by researcher for last ten years. Many approaches and feature set are proposed for improving classification model of fake review detection. There are two types of dataset commonly used in this research area: psuedo fake and real life reviews. Literature reports low performance of classification model real life dataset if compared with pseudo…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpam and Phishing Detection · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Misinformation and Its Impacts
