Reply to Robinson and Michaud, arXiv:2002.08893
Noah Kurinsky, Daniel Baxter, Yonatan Kahn, Gordan Krnjaic, Peter, Abbamonte

TL;DR
This paper is a formal reply to a comment on a previous work discussing excesses in low-threshold dark matter searches, emphasizing the need for direct calibration of plasmon charge yields at low energies.
Contribution
It clarifies and defends the original claims about plasmon behavior at low energies, addressing objections and emphasizing calibration needs.
Findings
Plasmon charge yields at ~10 eV are critical for dark matter detection.
Objections about plasmon-phonon branching do not invalidate original conclusions.
Future measurements are essential for calibration at low energy scales.
Abstract
We respond to Robinson and Michaud's (RM) comment (arXiv:2002.08893) on our recent preprint arXiv:2002.06937, in which we discuss recent excesses in low-threshold dark matter searches, and offer a potential unifying dark matter interpretation. We thank RM for their feedback, which highlights the critical need for future measurements to directly calibrate plasmon charge yields for low 10 eV energy depositions. RM objected to our assertion that plasmons generated at energy scales below 100~eV may have a large branching fraction into phonons. As we argue below, the points raised by RM do not invalidate our primary conclusions, as they pertain to a much different energy scale than we discuss in our paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials
