Comment on "Noise, not squeezing, boosts synchronization in the deep quantum regime" arXiv:2002.07488 (2020)
Michal Hajdu\v{s}ek, Sai Vinjanampathy

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent study on quantum synchronization, highlighting errors in their equations, inconsistent parameter variation, and misleading conclusions, thereby questioning the validity of their claims.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of the previous work, clarifying the importance of correct equations and parameter handling in quantum synchronization research.
Findings
Identifies errors in the equations used in the original study
Highlights issues with parameter variation methodology
Questions the validity of the original conclusions
Abstract
A recent manuscript ( arXiv:2002.07488 (2020) ) compares the effect of linear dissipators and squeezing drive on quantum synchronisation. We point at serious mistakes in the validity of the equations they use, the consistency of the ansatz employed, the unregulated fashion in which parameters are varied and the misleading scientific statements made in their manuscript.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography
