xAI-GAN: Enhancing Generative Adversarial Networks via Explainable AI Systems

TL;DR

This paper introduces xAI-GAN, a novel GAN framework that incorporates explainable AI to provide richer feedback during training, leading to improved image quality and data efficiency.

Contribution

The paper proposes integrating explainable AI into GAN training to enhance feedback quality, resulting in better performance and more user control.

Findings

xAI-GAN improves image quality by up to 23.18% in FID score.

xAI-GAN performs well with less data, outperforming standard GANs trained on more data.

Combining xAI-GAN with Differentiable Augmentation yields even better results.

Abstract

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are a revolutionary class of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) that have been successfully used to generate realistic images, music, text, and other data. However, GAN training presents many challenges, notably it can be very resource-intensive. A potential weakness in GANs is that it requires a lot of data for successful training and data collection can be an expensive process. Typically, the corrective feedback from discriminator DNNs to generator DNNs (namely, the discriminator's assessment of the generated example) is calculated using only one real-numbered value (loss). By contrast, we propose a new class of GAN we refer to as xAI-GAN that leverages recent advances in explainable AI (xAI) systems to provide a "richer" form of corrective feedback from discriminators to generators. Specifically, we modify the gradient descent process using xAI systems that specify the reason as to why the discriminator made the classification it did, thus providing the "richer" corrective feedback that helps the generator to better fool the discriminator. Using our approach, we observe xAI-GANs provide an improvement of up to 23.18% in the quality of generated images on both MNIST and FMNIST datasets over standard GANs as measured by Frechet Inception Distance (FID). We further compare xAI-GAN trained on 20% of the data with standard GAN trained on 100% of data on the CIFAR10 dataset and find that xAI-GAN still shows an improvement in FID score. Further, we compare our work with Differentiable Augmentation - which has been shown to make GANs data-efficient - and show that xAI-GANs outperform GANs trained on Differentiable Augmentation. Moreover, both techniques can be combined to produce even better results. Finally, we argue that xAI-GAN enables users greater control over how models learn than standard GANs.