The Tree Stabbing Number is not Monotone
Wolfgang Mulzer, Johannes Obenaus

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the tree stabbing number, a measure of how a spanning tree intersects lines, is not monotonic with respect to point set inclusion, answering an open problem in computational geometry.
Contribution
It proves that the tree stabbing number is not a monotone parameter, providing a counterexample to a previously open question.
Findings
Tree stabbing number is not monotone with point set inclusion
Counterexample disproves monotonicity of the parameter
Answers an open problem in computational geometry
Abstract
Let be a set of points and be a spanning tree of . The \emph{stabbing number} of is the maximum number of intersections any line in the plane determines with the edges of . The \emph{tree stabbing number} of is the minimum stabbing number of any spanning tree of . We prove that the tree stabbing number is not a monotone parameter, i.e., there exist point sets such that \treestab{} \treestab{}, answering a question by Eppstein \cite[Open Problem~17.5]{eppstein_2018}.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Advanced Graph Theory Research · VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
