Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Dynamic Treatment Effects via g-Estimation
Greg Lewis, Vasilis Syrgkanis

TL;DR
This paper extends the double/debiased machine learning framework to estimate dynamic treatment effects in complex models, enabling high-dimensional control, heterogeneity analysis, and off-policy evaluation with finite sample guarantees.
Contribution
It introduces a novel recursive $g$-estimation approach with orthogonalization, allowing for flexible, high-dimensional, and non-linear dynamic treatment effect estimation with theoretical guarantees.
Findings
Provides finite sample guarantees for dynamic treatment effect estimation.
Enables estimation of non-linear heterogeneity effects in dynamic regimes.
Supports high-dimensional sparse modeling with automated selection.
Abstract
We consider the estimation of treatment effects in settings when multiple treatments are assigned over time and treatments can have a causal effect on future outcomes or the state of the treated unit. We propose an extension of the double/debiased machine learning framework to estimate the dynamic effects of treatments, which can be viewed as a Neyman orthogonal (locally robust) cross-fitted version of -estimation in the dynamic treatment regime. Our method applies to a general class of non-linear dynamic treatment models known as Structural Nested Mean Models and allows the use of machine learning methods to control for potentially high dimensional state variables, subject to a mean square error guarantee, while still allowing parametric estimation and construction of confidence intervals for the structural parameters of interest. These structural parameters can be used for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Statistical Methods and Inference
