Overview of chemical ontologies
Christian Pachl, Nils Frank, Jan Breitbart, Stefan Br\"ase

TL;DR
This paper reviews the current state of chemical ontologies, highlighting their definitions, structures, and the challenges faced in their development and acceptance within the scientific community.
Contribution
It provides an overview of existing chemical ontologies, discusses their limitations, and categorizes major developments in chemical analytical methods, name reactions, and scientific units.
Findings
Chemical ontologies are still in early development stages.
No chemical ontology has achieved widespread acceptance.
Current ontologies are often fragmentary or incomplete.
Abstract
Ontologies order and interconnect knowledge of a certain field in a formal and semantic way so that they are machine-parsable. They try to define allwhere acceptable definition of concepts and objects, classify them, provide properties as well as interconnect them with relations (e.g. "A is a special case of B"). More precisely, Tom Gruber defines Ontologies as a "specification of a conceptualization; [...] a description (like a formal specification of a program) of the concepts and relationships that can exist for an agent or a community of agents." [1] An Ontology is made of Individuals which are organized in Classes. Both can have Attributes and Relations among themselves. Some complex Ontologies define Restrictions, Rules and Events which change attributes or relations. To be computer accessible they are written in certain ontology languages, like the OBO language or the more used…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and advancements in chemistry · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
