Majority Voting and the Condorcet's Jury Theorem
Hanan Shteingart, Eran Marom, Igor Itkin, Gil Shabat, Michael, Kolomenkin, Moshe Salhov, and Liran Katzir

TL;DR
This paper explores the connection between Condorcet's jury theorem and ensemble learning, providing a simple, rigorous proof to enhance understanding and teaching of the underlying principles in machine learning.
Contribution
The paper offers a clear, accessible mathematical proof of Condorcet's jury theorem, linking it to modern ensemble learning concepts and aiding educational efforts.
Findings
Provides a rigorous proof of Condorcet's theorem
Establishes a connection between voting theory and ensemble learning
Aims to improve teaching of machine learning fundamentals
Abstract
There is a striking relationship between a three hundred years old Political Science theorem named "Condorcet's jury theorem" (1785), which states that majorities are more likely to choose correctly when individual votes are often correct and independent, and a modern Machine Learning concept called "Strength of Weak Learnability" (1990), which describes a method for converting a weak learning algorithm into one that achieves arbitrarily high accuracy and stands in the basis of Ensemble Learning. Albeit the intuitive statement of Condorcet's theorem, we could not find a compact and simple rigorous mathematical proof of the theorem neither in classical handbooks of Machine Learning nor in published papers. By all means we do not claim to discover or reinvent a theory nor a result. We humbly want to offer a more publicly available simple derivation of the theorem. We will find joy in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Machine Learning and Data Classification
