Design Principles and Clinician Preferences for Pharmacogenomic Clinical Decision Support Alerts

TL;DR

This study explores clinician preferences for pharmacogenomic decision support alerts, emphasizing design principles like clarity, brevity, and trusted sources to enhance usability and patient care.

Contribution

It provides empirical insights into clinician preferences for PGx CDS alert design, informing future development of more effective and user-friendly tools.

Findings

Clinicians prefer interruptive pop-up alerts during order entry.

They favor brief descriptions of drug-gene interactions and clear recommendations.

Clinicians trust professional society guidelines and resources like UpToDate.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To better understand clinician needs and preferences for the display of pharmacogenomic (PGx) information in clinical decision support (CDS) tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a semi-structured interview to collect feedback and preferences in six key areas of PGx CDS design, from clinicians who had prior experience with live PGx CDS tools. Eight clinicians from Northwestern Medicine's (NM) General Internal Medicine clinic participated in the study. RESULTS: Clinicians expressed preference for interruptive pop-up alerts during order entry, brief descriptions of relevant drug-gene interactions, and a clear and specific recommended alternative course of action when a medication is contraindicated. They did not wish to see detailed genetic data, preferring phenotypic information predicted from the genotype. Nor did they wish to be interrupted when genetic test results do not indicate a change in treatment plan. Clinicians reported little familiarity with Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium prescribing recommendations but reported trusting recommendations of their professional societies and resources like UpToDate. Analysis of unstructured comments concurred with structured results, indicating a general uncertainty among participants around how to interpret and apply PGx information in practice. DISCUSSION: Results point to several underlying principles that can inform future PGx CDS alert designs: Be Specific and Actionable; Be Brief; Display Phenotypes not Genotypes; Rely on Sources Clinicians Already Trust; and, Be Adaptable to Learning Effects. CONCLUSION: This study is part of a broader socio-technical design approach to PGx CDS design underway at NM and provides a baseline for future PGx CDS development. Designs based on these results have the potential to improve clinician education and adherence levels, and to improve patient outcomes.