Deontological Ethics By Monotonicity Shape Constraints
Serena Wang, Maya Gupta

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to embed deontological ethical principles into machine learning models using shape constraints, aiming to enhance AI responsibility and trustworthiness.
Contribution
It proposes a novel approach of incorporating ethical constraints via shape constraints in models, linking deontological principles with fairness goals.
Findings
Shape constraints can enforce ethical principles in models.
The approach applies to sensitive attributes like income and age.
It promotes more responsible AI behavior.
Abstract
We demonstrate how easy it is for modern machine-learned systems to violate common deontological ethical principles and social norms such as "favor the less fortunate," and "do not penalize good attributes." We propose that in some cases such ethical principles can be incorporated into a machine-learned model by adding shape constraints that constrain the model to respond only positively to relevant inputs. We analyze the relationship between these deontological constraints that act on individuals and the consequentialist group-based fairness goals of one-sided statistical parity and equal opportunity. This strategy works with sensitive attributes that are Boolean or real-valued such as income and age, and can help produce more responsible and trustworthy AI.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
