Science Under Attack

TL;DR

The paper argues that the orthodox view of science is fundamentally irrational because it ignores metaphysical, value-based, and social assumptions, calling for a more honest and rigorous conception of scientific rationality.

Contribution

It reveals the irrational aspects of current scientific rationality and advocates for a conception that openly addresses its problematic aims.

Findings

Current science suppresses metaphysical and value-based assumptions.

A more rigorous, honest conception of science is needed.

Addressing these issues can improve scientific practice.

Abstract

Some attack scientific rationality, others defend it, but both miss the point. What both parties take to be scientific rationality is actually a species of irrationality masquerading as scientific rationality. The current orthodox conception of science, taken for granted by scientists and non-scientists alike, is irrational because it suppresses problematic assumptions, inherent in the aims of science, having to do with metaphysics, values, and political and social issues. We urgently need a more rigorous conception of science to be adopted and implemented that honestly acknowledges the problematic character of the aims of science, and seeks to improve them as science proceeds.