Validating the Universe in a Box
Chris Smeenk, Sarah C. Gallagher

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges of validating large-scale universe simulations and proposes a structured code validation approach using eliminative reasoning to improve reliability assessment.
Contribution
It introduces a novel validation methodology based on eliminative reasoning to better identify and reduce sources of error in cosmological simulations.
Findings
Structured validation can improve simulation reliability
Eliminative reasoning helps isolate sources of error
Proposed approach complements existing robustness analyses
Abstract
Computer simulations of the formation and evolution of large scale structure in the universe are integral to the enterprise of modern cosmology. Establishing the reliability of these simulations has been extremely challenging, primarily because of epistemic opacity. In this setting, robustness analysis defined by requiring converging outputs from a diverse ensemble of simulations is insufficient to determine simulation validity. Instead, we propose an alternative path of structured code validation that applies eliminative reasoning to isolate and reduce possible sources of error, a potential path that is already being explored by some cosmologists.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
