Double-End Queues with Non-Poisson Inputs and Their Effective Algorithms
Heng-Li Liu, Quan-Lin Li, Yan-Xia Chang, Chi Zhang

TL;DR
This paper models a double-ended queue with non-Poisson inputs using a bilateral QBD process, providing stability analysis, performance measures, and three algorithms for practical computation, applicable to real-world matching systems.
Contribution
It introduces a new bilateral QBD process model for double-ended queues with non-Poisson inputs and develops effective algorithms for performance analysis.
Findings
Queue stability is guaranteed by customer impatience.
Performance measures are accurately computed using the proposed algorithms.
Numerical examples illustrate the influence of system parameters.
Abstract
It is interesting and challenging to study double-ended queues with First-Come-First-Match discipline under customers' impatient behavior and non-Poisson inputs. The system stability can be guaranteed by the customers' impatient behavior, while the existence of impatient customers makes analysis of such double-ended queues more difficult or even impossible to find an explicitly analytic solution, thus it becomes more and more important to develop effective numerical methods in a variety of practical matching problems. This paper studies a block-structured double-ended queue, whose block structure comes from two independent Markovian arrival processes (MAPs), which are non-Poisson inputs. We show that such a queue can be expressed as a new bilateral quasi birth-and-death (QBD) process which has its own interest. Based on this, we provide a detailed analysis for both the bilateral QBD…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Probability and Risk Models
