Hard 3-CNF-SAT problems are in $P$ -- A first step in proving $NP=P$
Marcel R\'emon, Johan Barth\'elemy

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel lattice framework and a multi-linear descriptor function to solve hard 3-CNF-SAT problems in polynomial time, suggesting a potential breakthrough towards proving $NP=P$.
Contribution
It introduces a new mathematical framework and polynomial algorithm for solving certain 3-CNF-SAT problems, challenging the traditional complexity assumptions.
Findings
Polynomial complexity for computing solution sets of hard 3-CNF-SAT problems.
Development of a greedy polynomial algorithm for solving these problems.
Implication that some NP problems may be in P, impacting the P vs NP question.
Abstract
The relationship between the complexity classes and is an unsolved question in the field of theoretical computer science. In the first part of this paper, a lattice framework is proposed to handle the 3-CNF-SAT problems, known to be in . In the second section, we define a multi-linear descriptor function for any 3-CNF-SAT problem of size , in the sense that is such that is the set of all the solutions of . A new merge operation is defined, where is a single 3-CNF clause. Given [but this can be of exponential complexity], the complexity needed for the computation of , the set of all solutions, is shown to be polynomial for hard 3-CNF-SAT problems, i.e. the one with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
