Modeling the uncertainties of solar-system ephemerides for robust gravitational-wave searches with pulsar timing arrays
M. Vallisneri, S. R. Taylor, J. Simon, W. M. Folkner, R. S. Park, C., Cutler, J. A. Ellis, T. J. W. Lazio, S. J. Vigeland, K. Aggarwal, Z., Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, S., Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford

TL;DR
This paper introduces BayesEphem, a physical model for solar-system ephemeris uncertainties, to improve the robustness of gravitational-wave searches with pulsar timing arrays by accounting for Earth's positional errors.
Contribution
The paper develops and applies a Bayesian model of ephemeris uncertainties focusing on Jupiter's orbital elements, enhancing gravitational-wave detection robustness.
Findings
Ephemeris modeling reduces gravitational-wave sensitivity in current datasets.
Degeneracy from ephemeris errors diminishes with improved ephemerides and longer datasets.
BayesEphem provides a foundation for future robust gravitational-wave searches.
Abstract
The regularity of pulsar emissions becomes apparent once we reference the pulses' times of arrivals to the inertial rest frame of the solar system. It follows that errors in the determination of Earth's position with respect to the solar-system barycenter can appear as a time-correlated bias in pulsar-timing residual time series, affecting the searches for low-frequency gravitational waves performed with pulsar timing arrays. Indeed, recent array datasets yield different gravitational-wave background upper limits and detection statistics when analyzed with different solar-system ephemerides. Crucially, the ephemerides do not generally provide usable error representations. In this article we describe the motivation, construction, and application of a physical model of solar-system ephemeris uncertainties, which focuses on the degrees of freedom (Jupiter's orbital elements) most relevant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
