Relativistic decomposition of the orbital and the spin angular momentum in chiral physics and Feynman's angular momentum paradox
Kenji Fukushima, Shi Pu

TL;DR
This paper explores the decomposition of orbital and spin angular momentum in relativistic and chiral physics, highlighting differences between canonical and Belinfante definitions and their implications for nuclear collision dynamics.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of angular momentum decomposition in relativistic chiral physics, emphasizing the fermionic contributions and their relation to Feynman's angular momentum paradox.
Findings
Difference between canonical and Belinfante angular momentum decompositions highlighted.
Relevance of angular momentum decomposition to early-time dynamics in nucleus-nucleus collisions.
Potential excess electromagnetic angular momentum in high-energy nuclear interactions.
Abstract
Over recent years we have witnessed tremendous progresses in our understanding on the angular momentum decomposition. In the context of the proton spin problem in high energy processes the angular momentum decomposition by Jaffe and Manohar, which is based on the canonical definition, and the alternative by Ji, which is based on the Belinfante improved one, have been revisited under light shed by Chen et al. leading to seminal works by Hatta, Wakamatsu, Leader, etc. In chiral physics as exemplified by the chiral vortical effect and applications to the relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, sometimes referred to as a relativistic extension of the Barnett and the Einstein--de Haas effects, such arguments of the angular momentum decomposition would be of crucial importance. We pay our special attention to the fermionic part in the canonical and the Belinfante conventions and discuss a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
