A Probabilistic Case For A Large Missing Carbon Sink On Mars After 3.5 Billion Years Ago
Andy W. Heard, and Edwin S. Kite

TL;DR
This paper argues that Mars's recent water features cannot be explained by significant CO2 loss to space, suggesting instead a large, undiscovered geological carbon sink to account for the observed climate history.
Contribution
It introduces a novel analysis showing that water loss on Mars was mainly due to H2O escape, not CO2, implying a large missing carbon sink in Mars's geological history.
Findings
Oxygen escape was mainly from H2O, not CO2
Limited CO2 loss to space in the last 3.5 billion years
Presence of water features suggests a large geological carbon sink
Abstract
Mars has a thin (6 mbar) CO2 atmosphere currently. There is strong evidence for paleolakes and rivers formed by warm climates on Mars, including after 3.5 billion years (Ga) ago, which indicates that a CO2 atmosphere thick enough to permit a warm climate was present at these times. Since Mars no longer has a thick CO2 atmosphere, it must have been lost. One possibility is that Martian CO2 was lost to space. Oxygen escape rates from Mars are high enough to account for loss of a thick CO2 atmosphere, if CO2 was the main source of escaping O. But here, using H isotope ratios, O escape calculations, and quantification of the surface O sinks on Mars, we show for the first time that O escape from Mars after 3.5 Ga must have been predominantly associated with the loss of H2O, not CO2, and therefore it is unlikely that >250 mbar Martian CO2 has been lost to space in the last 3.5 Ga, because…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPlanetary Science and Exploration · Space Exploration and Technology · Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
