Admissibility versus $A_p$-conditions on regular trees
Khanh Ngoc Nguyen, Zhuang Wang

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that on rooted K-ary trees, the combination of doubling and the $(1,p)$-Poincare inequality is equivalent to an $A_p$-condition, linking geometric and analytic properties.
Contribution
It establishes an equivalence between geometric and analytic conditions on regular trees, connecting doubling, Poincare inequalities, and $A_p$-conditions.
Findings
Doubling and Poincare inequality are equivalent to $A_p$-condition on regular trees.
Provides a characterization of analytic conditions via geometric properties.
Links between different conditions deepen understanding of analysis on trees.
Abstract
We show that the combination of doubling and -Poincare inequality is equivalent to a version of the -condition on rooted K-ary trees.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Geometry and complex manifolds · Point processes and geometric inequalities
