Non elementary classes of relation and cylindric algebras
Tarek Sayed Ahmed

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that various classes of cylindric and relation algebras, including neat reducts and representable algebras, are not definable within first-order logic, highlighting their non-elementary nature.
Contribution
It establishes the non-elementarity of several classes of cylindric and relation algebras, including those involving neat reducts and complete representations, extending the understanding of their logical complexity.
Findings
Certain classes between $ extsf{Ra} extsf{CA}_eta$ are not elementary.
Classes involving $ extsf{Nr}_n extsf{CA}_m$ and $ extsf{CRCA}_n$ are not first-order definable.
No elementary classes exist between specific classes of relation and cylindric algebras.
Abstract
For any pair of ordinals , denotes the class of cylindric algebras of dimension , denote the class of representable s and ( denotes the class of -neat reducts (relation algebra reducts) of . We show that any class such that , is not elementary, i.e not definable in first order logic. Let . It is also shown that any class such that , where is the class of completely representable s, and denotes the operation of forming complete subalgebras, is proved not to be elementary. Finally, we show that any class such that $\mathbf{S}_d\sf Ra…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
