TL;DR
This paper investigates how selecting appropriate machine learning algorithms based on specific use-case considerations enhances the performance and reliability of nanomaterial-based optical sensors, enabling practical deployment despite inherent variabilities.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the optimal ML algorithm depends on use-case factors and shows how to improve long-term stability without recalibration, advancing nanomaterial sensor applications.
Findings
kNN and Bayesian inference achieve highest accuracy but are computationally intensive
ANNs provide fast results with reasonable accuracy after training
SVMs perform well with limited data, reducing training requirements
Abstract
Due to their inherent variabilities,nanomaterial-based sensors are challenging to translate into real-world applications,where reliability/reproducibility is key.Recently we showed Bayesian inference can be employed on engineered variability in layered nanomaterial-based optical transmission filters to determine optical wavelengths with high accuracy/precision.In many practical applications the sensing cost/speed and long-term reliability can be equal or more important considerations.Though various machine learning tools are frequently used on sensor/detector networks to address these,nonetheless their effectiveness on nanomaterial-based sensors has not been explored.Here we show the best choice of ML algorithm in a cyber-nanomaterial detector is mainly determined by specific use considerations,e.g.,accuracy, computational cost,speed, and resilience against drifts/ageing effects.When…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
