Case AD, AR, and AS binary evolution and their possible connections with W UMa binaries
Dengkai Jiang

TL;DR
This study investigates the evolutionary pathways of close binary systems into contact, focusing on cases AD, AR, and AS, and assesses their potential to explain observed W UMa binaries through stellar evolution modeling.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of the evolutionary outcomes of cases AD, AR, and AS, highlighting their different abilities to produce W UMa binaries and matching observed properties.
Findings
Case AR and AS better match observed W UMa period-colour relations.
Only case AR and AS produce a low-mass, short-period limit consistent with observations.
Case AD shows poor agreement with observed W UMa binary properties.
Abstract
Close detached binaries were theoretically predicted to evolve into contact by three subtypes of case A binary evolution: case AD, AR, and AS, which correspond to the formation of contact during dynamic-, thermal-, and nuclear-timescale mass transfer phase, respectively. It is unclear, however, what is the difference between contact binaries in these subtypes, and whether all of these subtypes can account for the formation of observed W UMa binaries. Using Eggleton's stellar evolution code with the nonconservative assumption, I obtained the low-mass contact binaries produced by case AD, AR, and AS at the moment of contact, and their parameter spaces. The results support that the progenitors of low-mass contact binaries are detached binaries with orbital periods shorter than d, and their borderlines depend strongly on the primary mass. In addition, the period-colour relations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
