TL;DR
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of weakly-supervised semantic segmentation methods across different image domains, highlighting domain-specific challenges and the need for more generalizable solutions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive cross-domain analysis of existing methods and offers practical techniques for applying them to unseen datasets.
Findings
Methods perform well on their original datasets
Performance drops significantly on histopathology and satellite images
Domain-specific challenges require tailored approaches
Abstract
Recently proposed methods for weakly-supervised semantic segmentation have achieved impressive performance in predicting pixel classes despite being trained with only image labels which lack positional information. Because image annotations are cheaper and quicker to generate, weak supervision is more practical than full supervision for training segmentation algorithms. These methods have been predominantly developed to solve the background separation and partial segmentation problems presented by natural scene images and it is unclear whether they can be simply transferred to other domains with different characteristics, such as histopathology and satellite images, and still perform well. This paper evaluates state-of-the-art weakly-supervised semantic segmentation methods on natural scene, histopathology, and satellite image datasets and analyzes how to determine which method is most…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
