Device-independent Randomness Expansion with Entangled Photons
Lynden K. Shalm, Yanbao Zhang, Joshua C. Bienfang, Collin Schlager,, Martin J. Stevens, Michael D. Mazurek, Carlos Abell\'an, Waldimar Amaya,, Morgan W. Mitchell, Mohammad A. Alhejji, Honghao Fu, Joel Ornstein, Richard, P. Mirin, Sae Woo Nam, Emanuel Knill

TL;DR
This paper presents a device-independent randomness expansion protocol using entangled photons, achieving a 24% increase in certified randomness over input bits with high speed and low error, enhancing trust in public and private randomness sources.
Contribution
It introduces a novel spot-checking protocol that efficiently expands randomness without additional biased bits, demonstrated through a photonic loophole-free Bell test.
Findings
Produced 24% more randomness than input bits
Achieved an average rate of 3606 bits/sec
Bounded soundness error at 5.7×10⁻⁷
Abstract
With the growing availability of experimental loophole-free Bell tests, it has become possible to implement a new class of device-independent random number generators whose output can be certified to be uniformly random without requiring a detailed model of the quantum devices used. However, all of these experiments require many input bits in order to certify a small number of output bits, and it is an outstanding challenge to develop a system that generates more randomness than is consumed. Here, we devise a device-independent spot-checking protocol that consumes only uniform bits without requiring any additional bits with a specific bias. Implemented with a photonic loophole-free Bell test, we can produce 24% more certified output bits (1,181,264,237) than consumed input bits (953,301,640). The experiment ran for 91.0 hours, creating randomness at an average rate of 3606 bits/s with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
