Tensor Basis Gaussian Process Models of Hyperelastic Materials
Ari Frankel, Reese Jones, Laura Swiler

TL;DR
This paper introduces physics-informed Gaussian process models for hyperelastic materials, embedding physical invariances to improve accuracy and data efficiency in stress and strain-energy predictions.
Contribution
It develops invariant GPR models for hyperelasticity, incorporating physical constraints and demonstrating improved accuracy and data efficiency over traditional methods.
Findings
Invariant GPR models require fewer training data.
The models achieve higher accuracy while maintaining rotational invariance.
Strain-energy density can be accurately recovered from limited data.
Abstract
In this work, we develop Gaussian process regression (GPR) models of hyperelastic material behavior. First, we consider the direct approach of modeling the components of the Cauchy stress tensor as a function of the components of the Finger stretch tensor in a Gaussian process. We then consider an improvement on this approach that embeds rotational invariance of the stress-stretch constitutive relation in the GPR representation. This approach requires fewer training examples and achieves higher accuracy while maintaining invariance to rotations exactly. Finally, we consider an approach that recovers the strain-energy density function and derives the stress tensor from this potential. Although the error of this model for predicting the stress tensor is higher, the strain-energy density is recovered with high accuracy from limited training data. The approaches presented here are examples…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsGaussian Process
