Measuring the Fidelity of Asteroid Regolith and Cobble Simulants
Philip T. Metzger, Daniel T. Britt, Stephen Covey, Cody Schultz, Kevin, M. Cannon, Kevin D. Grossman, James G. Mantovani, Robert P. Mueller

TL;DR
This paper extends NASA's 'Figure of Merit' method to evaluate the fidelity of asteroid simulants, including regolith and cobbles, by comparing their properties to asteroid and meteorite references, demonstrating high fidelity of a new simulant.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic grading method for asteroid simulants based on multiple properties, applying it to a new simulant and validating its high fidelity.
Findings
Simulant has high figures of merit across evaluated properties.
The methodology effectively assesses simulant fidelity.
The approach is recommended for broader asteroid research use.
Abstract
NASA has developed a "Figure of Merit" method to grade the fidelity of lunar simulants for scientific and engineering purposes. Here we extend the method to grade asteroid simulants, both regolith and cobble variety, and we apply the method to the newly developed asteroid regolith and cobble simulant UCF/DSI-CI-2. The reference material that is used to evaluate this simulant for most asteroid properties is the Orgueil meteorite. Those properties are the mineralogical and elemental composition, grain density, bulk density of cobbles, magnetic susceptibility, mechanical strength of cobbles, and volatile release patterns. To evaluate the regolith simulant's particle sizing we use a reference model that was based upon the sample returned from Itokawa by Hayabusa, the boulder count on Hayabusa, and four cases of disrupted asteroids that indicate particle sizing of the subsurface material.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
