Molybdenum dichalcogenide cathodes for aluminium-ion batteries
Shalini Divya, James H. Johnston, Thomas Nann

TL;DR
This study explores molybdenum dichalcogenides as cathodes in aluminium-ion batteries, demonstrating their electrochemical performance, stability, and capacity differences among MoS2, MoSe2, and MoSSe.
Contribution
It introduces molybdenum dichalcogenides as novel cathode materials for aluminium-ion batteries and compares their electrochemical properties.
Findings
MoSe2 outperformed MoS2 in capacity and energy density.
MoSe2 cells maintained 90% efficiency over 200 cycles.
MoSSe showed higher specific capacity but lower energy density.
Abstract
Many successful battery electrodes are based on 2D-layered materials. We have studied aluminium-ion batteries using molybdenum dichalcogenides: \ce{MoS2}, \ce{MoSe2} and MoSSe as active cathode materials. The batteries showed clear discharge voltage plateaus in the ranges 1.6 - 1.4 V for \ce{MoS2} and \ce{MoSe2}, and 0.6 - 0.5 V for MoSSe. \ce{MoS2} and \ce{MoSe2} have similar crystal structures, interestingly we found that \ce{MoSe2} performed better than \ce{MoS2}. MoSSe exhibited a higher specific capacity over \ce{MoS2} and \ce{MoSe2}, but the energy density was lower than \ce{MoSe2} at a current rate of 40 mA g. \ce{MoSe2} cells recorded a discharge capacity of 110 mAh g with an average potential in the range of 2.0 - 1.8 V and 1.5 - 0.8 V during discharge. The cells were stable at 100 mA g for over 200 cycles with 90\% coulombic efficiency.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
