Exploring Interpretability for Predictive Process Analytics
Renuka Sindhgatta, Chun Ouyang, Catarina Moreira

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of interpretability in predictive process analytics, demonstrating how explainable machine learning models can provide insights beyond mere accuracy in business process predictions.
Contribution
It introduces the use of interpretable machine learning techniques to evaluate and compare predictive models in business process management, highlighting the value of explanations.
Findings
Interpretability helps understand model predictions.
Accuracy alone may not determine model suitability.
Explanations reveal underlying reasons for predictions.
Abstract
Modern predictive analytics underpinned by machine learning techniques has become a key enabler to the automation of data-driven decision making. In the context of business process management, predictive analytics has been applied to making predictions about the future state of an ongoing business process instance, for example, when will the process instance complete and what will be the outcome upon completion. Machine learning models can be trained on event log data recording historical process execution to build the underlying predictive models. Multiple techniques have been proposed so far which encode the information available in an event log and construct input features required to train a predictive model. While accuracy has been a dominant criterion in the choice of various techniques, they are often applied as a black-box in building predictive models. In this paper, we derive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsInterpretability
