LB-1 is inconsistent with the X-ray source population and pulsar-black hole binary searches in the Milky Way
Mohammadtaher Safarzadeh, Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz, Charles Kilpatrick

TL;DR
This paper challenges the claimed detection of LB-1 as a black hole binary in the Milky Way, arguing that evolutionary models and lack of observational evidence make such systems highly unlikely.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis of binary evolution and observational constraints, showing that LB-1-like systems are inconsistent with expected X-ray and pulsar observations in the Milky Way.
Findings
LBX sources from 8 M_sun stars around BHs are rare in the MW.
No pulsar-BH binaries have been detected, constraining their frequency.
The observed LB-1 system is inconsistent with evolutionary and observational expectations.
Abstract
If confirmed, a wide binary system of 70 black hole (BH) and an 8 main sequence star (LB-1) is observed to reside in the Milky Way (MW). We show that long term evolution of an 8 star around a BH with mass between 5-70 makes them visible as ultra-luminous X-ray (ULX) sources in the sky. Given the expected ULX phase lifetime ( Myr) and their lack of detection in the MW, we conclude that the frequency of an 8-20 star to be in binary around a stellar mass BH should be less than (). This is in tension with Liu et al. (2019) claimed detection frequency of LB-1 like system around 8-20 stars (). Moreover, the 8 star is likely to end as a neutron star (NS) born with a very small kick from an electron capture supernova (ECSN), leaving behind a wide NS-BH binary.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
