Three-dimensional and four-dimensional scalar, vector, tensor cosmological fluctuations and the cosmological decomposition theorem
Matthew G. Phelps, Asanka Amarasinghe, Philip D. Mannheim

TL;DR
This paper investigates the scalar, vector, tensor (SVT) decomposition in cosmological perturbation theory, showing that the standard decomposition theorem generally holds only at a higher-derivative level and introducing an alternative basis for simplification.
Contribution
It introduces an alternative SVT basis based on 4D transformations and analyzes the conditions under which the decomposition theorem applies in various cosmological backgrounds.
Findings
Decomposition theorem holds at higher-derivative level with boundary conditions.
Standard SVT components may involve mixed scalar and vector parts.
Alternative basis simplifies fluctuation equations but does not guarantee decomposition at the equation level.
Abstract
In cosmological perturbation theory it is convenient to use the scalar, vector, tensor (SVT) basis as defined according to how these components transform under 3-dimensional rotations. In attempting to solve the fluctuation equations that are automatically written in terms of gauge-invariant combinations of these components, the equations are taken to break up into separate SVT sectors, the decomposition theorem. Here, without needing to specify a gauge, we solve the fluctuation equations exactly for some standard cosmologies, to show that in general the various gauge-invariant combinations only separate at a higher-derivative level. To achieve separation at the level of the fluctuation equations themselves one has to assume boundary conditions for the higher-derivative equations. While asymptotic conditions suffice for fluctuations around a dS background or a RW background, for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
