Non-minimal (self-)running inflation: metric vs. Palatini formulation
Antonio Racioppi

TL;DR
This paper compares metric and Palatini formulations of non-minimal quartic inflation, analyzing radiative corrections and renormalization choices, and assesses compatibility with Planck data.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of inflation models under different gravity formulations and renormalization schemes, highlighting their observational implications.
Findings
Different formulations yield distinct inflationary predictions.
Radiative corrections significantly influence the inflation potential.
Some models remain compatible with Planck data.
Abstract
We consider a model of quartic inflation where the inflaton is coupled non-minimally to gravity and the self-induced radiative corrections to its effective potential are dominant. We perform a comparative analysis considering two different formulations of gravity, metric or Palatini, and two different choices for the renormalization scale, widely known as prescription I and II. Moreover we comment on the eventual compatibility of the results with the final data release of the Planck mission.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
