Re-analysis of Lepping's Fitting Method for Magnetic Clouds: Lundquist Fit Reloaded

TL;DR

This paper re-examines Lepping's magnetic cloud fitting method, clarifying its assumptions and interpreting its parameters to better understand flux rope properties and their evolution during interplanetary travel.

Contribution

It provides a reinterpretation of Lepping's method focusing on observed MC intervals, revealing asymmetries, boundary field behaviors, and revising key global quantities and twist profiles.

Findings

Crossed flux ropes are asymmetric with larger sides in size and flux.

Axial magnetic field at the largest side boundary is around zero, consistent with eruption physics.

Twist profiles in MCs form a continuum from uniform to increasing away from the axis.

Abstract

Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of ejecta, launched from the Sun as coronal mass ejections. The coherent rotation of the magnetic field vector observed in MCs leads to envision MCs as formed by flux ropes (FRs). Among all the methods used to analyze MCs, Lepping's method (Lepping et al, 1990, JGR 95, 11957) is the broadest used. While this fitting method does not require the axial field component to vanish at the MC boundaries, this idea is largely spread in publications. Then, we revisit Lepping's method to emphasize its hypothesis and the meaning of its output parameters. As originally defined, these parameters imply a fitted FR which could be smaller or larger than the studied MC. We rather provide a re-interpretation of Lepping's results with a fitted model limited to the observed MC interval. We find that, typically the crossed FRs are asymmetric with a larger side both in size and magnetic flux before or after the FR axis. At the boundary of the largest side we find an axial magnetic field component distributed around 0 which we justify by the physics of solar eruptions. In contrast, at the boundary of the smaller side the axial field distribution is shifted to positive values, as expected with erosion acting during the interplanetary travel. This new analysis of Lepping's results have several implications. First, global quantities, such as magnetic fluxes and helicity, need to be revised depending on the aim (estimating global properties of FRs just after the solar launch or at 1 au). Second, the deduced twist profiles in MCs range quasi-continuously from nearly uniform, to increasing away from the FR axis, up to a reversal near the MC boundaries. There is no trace of outsider cases, but a continuum of cases. Finally, the impact parameter of the remaining FR crossed at 1 au is revised. Its distribution is compatible with weakly flatten FR cross-sections.