Scalar field dark matter as an alternative explanation for the anisotropic distribution of satellite galaxies
Jordi Sol\'is-L\'opez, Francisco S. Guzm\'an, Tonatiuh Matos, Victor, H. Robles, L. Arturo Ure\~na-L\'opez

TL;DR
This paper proposes that scalar field dark matter, modeled through multi-state solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson equations, can explain the observed anisotropic distribution of satellite galaxies around major galaxies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel explanation for satellite galaxy anisotropy using multi-state scalar field dark matter halo models and tests particle trajectories within these potentials.
Findings
Particles tend to accumulate near the poles of the halo over time.
Orbital poles of satellites prefer the equatorial plane of the halo.
Anisotropy depends on monopolar or dipolar dominance in the potential.
Abstract
In recent years, the scalar field dark matter (SFDM), also called ultralight bosonic dark matter, has received considerable attention due to the number of problems it might help to solve. Among these are the cusp-core problem and the abundance of small structures of the standard cold dark matter (CDM) model. In this paper we show that multi-state solutions of the low energy and weak gravitational field limit of field equations, interpreted as galactic halo density profiles, can provide a possible explanation to the anisotropic distribution of satellite galaxies observed in the Milky Way, M31 and Centaurus A, where satellites trajectories seem to concentrate on planes close to the poles of the galaxies instead of following homogeneously distributed trajectories. The core hypothesis is that multi-state solutions of the equations describing the dynamics of this dark matter candidate,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
