Beyond teaching methods: highlighting physics faculty's strengths and agency
Linda E. Strubbe, Adrian M. Madsen, Sarah B. McKagan, and Eleanor C., Sayre

TL;DR
This paper proposes a new 'asset-based agentic paradigm' for understanding physics faculty teaching, emphasizing faculty ideas, values, and agency over specific teaching methods, supported by three case studies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel paradigm combining teaching principles and faculty agency frameworks, shifting focus from methods to faculty assets and agency in physics education research.
Findings
Frameworks of teaching principles and faculty agency effectively characterize teaching practices.
The asset-based agentic paradigm offers a comprehensive view of faculty teaching.
Case studies demonstrate the paradigm's applicability to real faculty perspectives.
Abstract
Much work in physics education research (PER) characterizes faculty teaching practice in terms of whether faculty use specific named PER-based teaching methods, either with fidelity or with adaptation; we call this research paradigm the "teaching-method-centered paradigm." However, most faculty do not frame their teaching in terms of which particular named methods they use, but rather in terms of their own ideas and values, suggesting that the teaching-method-centered paradigm misses key features of faculty teaching. These key features include the productive ideas that faculty have about student learning and faculty agency around teaching. We present three case studies of faculty talking about their teaching, and analyze them in terms of two theoretical frameworks: a framework of teaching principles (How Learning Works) and a framework of faculty agency (Self-Determination Theory). We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
