Evaluation of Multi-Slice Inputs to Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Segmentation

TL;DR

This study systematically evaluates the use of multi-slice inputs in CNNs for medical image segmentation, comparing pseudo-3D approaches to traditional 2D and 3D methods across various datasets and architectures.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of the performance and computational efficiency of pseudo-3D CNNs, revealing limited general benefits over standard 2D or 3D CNNs.

Findings

Pseudo-3D methods are more efficient than full 3D CNNs.

Limited segmentation performance improvement over 2D CNNs.

No clear relation between mask structure and segmentation accuracy.

Abstract

When using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for segmentation of organs and lesions in medical images, the conventional approach is to work with inputs and outputs either as single slice (2D) or whole volumes (3D). One common alternative, in this study denoted as pseudo-3D, is to use a stack of adjacent slices as input and produce a prediction for at least the central slice. This approach gives the network the possibility to capture 3D spatial information, with only a minor additional computational cost. In this study, we systematically evaluate the segmentation performance and computational costs of this pseudo-3D approach as a function of the number of input slices, and compare the results to conventional end-to-end 2D and 3D CNNs. The standard pseudo-3D method regards the neighboring slices as multiple input image channels. We additionally evaluate a simple approach where the input stack is a volumetric input that is repeatably convolved in 3D to obtain a 2D feature map. This 2D map is in turn fed into a standard 2D network. We conducted experiments using two different CNN backbone architectures and on five diverse data sets covering different anatomical regions, imaging modalities, and segmentation tasks. We found that while both pseudo-3D methods can process a large number of slices at once and still be computationally much more efficient than fully 3D CNNs, a significant improvement over a regular 2D CNN was only observed for one of the five data sets. An analysis of the structural properties of the segmentation masks revealed no relations to the segmentation performance with respect to the number of input slices. The conclusion is therefore that in the general case, multi-slice inputs appear to not significantly improve segmentation results over using 2D or 3D CNNs.