Intrusive acceleration strategies for Uncertainty Quantification for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws
Jonas Kusch, Jannick Wolters, Martin Frank

TL;DR
This paper introduces acceleration techniques for intrusive uncertainty quantification methods in hyperbolic systems, demonstrating improved efficiency and accuracy over non-intrusive approaches in fluid dynamics applications.
Contribution
The paper proposes novel acceleration strategies for intrusive methods, including PDE-constrained optimization and adaptive parallelization, enhancing their efficiency and accuracy.
Findings
Intrusive methods require fewer unknowns for a given accuracy.
Proposed techniques outperform Stochastic Collocation in speed.
Adaptive and parallel strategies improve computational efficiency.
Abstract
Methods for quantifying the effects of uncertainties in hyperbolic problems can be divided into intrusive and non-intrusive techniques. Non-intrusive methods allow the usage of a given deterministic solver in a black-box manner, while being embarrassingly parallel. However, avoiding intrusive modifications of a given solver takes away the ability to use several inherently intrusive numerical acceleration tools. Moreover, intrusive methods are expected to reach a given accuracy with a smaller number of unknowns compared to non-intrusive techniques. This effect is amplified in settings with high dimensional uncertainty. A downside of intrusive methods is however the need to guarantee hyperbolicity of the resulting moment system. In contrast to stochastic-Galerkin (SG), the Intrusive Polynomial Moment (IPM) method is able to maintain hyperbolicity at the cost of solving an optimization…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
