Limits on gas impermeability of graphene
P. Z. Sun, Q. Yang, W. J. Kuang, Y. V. Stebunov, W. Q. Xiong, J. Yu,, R. R. Nair, M. I. Katsnelson, S. J. Yuan, I. V. Grigorieva, M., Lozada-Hidalgo, F. C. Wang, A. K. Geim

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that defect-free graphene is nearly perfectly impermeable to most gases, with hydrogen being an exception due to a unique dissociation and permeation process, refining our understanding of graphene's barrier properties.
Contribution
The paper provides the most sensitive experimental evidence to date that defect-free graphene is essentially impermeable to gases, except hydrogen, revealing a new permeation mechanism for hydrogen.
Findings
Graphene is impermeable to gases like helium, neon, nitrogen, oxygen, argon, krypton, and xenon.
Hydrogen permeates through graphene via dissociation and atom flipping, not molecular transport.
Permeation detection limit is as low as a few atoms per hour.
Abstract
Despite being only one-atom thick, defect-free graphene is considered to be completely impermeable to all gases and liquids. This conclusion is based on theory and supported by experiments that could not detect gas permeation through micrometre-size membranes within a detection limit of 10^5 to 10^6 atoms per second. Here, using small monocrystalline containers tightly sealed with graphene, we show that defect-free graphene is impermeable with an accuracy of eight to nine orders of magnitude higher than in the previous experiments. We could discern permeation of just a few helium atoms per hour, and this detection limit is also valid for all other tested gases (neon, nitrogen, oxygen, argon, krypton and xenon), except for hydrogen. Hydrogen shows noticeable permeation, even though its molecule is larger than helium and should experience a higher energy barrier. The puzzling observation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
