Photometric analyses of Saturn's small moons: Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are dark; Helene and Calypso are bright
M.M. Hedman, P. Helfenstein, R.O. Chancia, P. Thomas, E. Roussos, C., Paranicas, A.J. Verbiscer

TL;DR
This study uses photometric modeling of Cassini data to analyze the surface brightness of Saturn's small moons, revealing correlations with radiation and dust fluxes that influence their darkness or brightness.
Contribution
It introduces a photometric model accounting for moon shapes and compares surface brightnesses, highlighting the roles of high-energy radiation and dust fluxes in surface properties.
Findings
Aegaeon, Methone, Pallene are darker than expected from trends.
Calypso and Helene are brighter than their co-orbital counterparts.
Surface brightness variations are linked to radiation and dust fluxes.
Abstract
We examine the surface brightnesses of Saturn's smaller satellites using a photometric model that explicitly accounts for their elongated shapes and thus facilitates comparisons among different moons. Analyses of Cassini imaging data with this model reveals that the moons Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are darker than one would expect given trends previously observed among the nearby mid-sized satellites. On the other hand, the trojan moons Calypso and Helene have substantially brighter surfaces than their co-orbital companions Tethys and Dione. These observations are inconsistent with the moons' surface brightnesses being entirely controlled by the local flux of E-ring particles, and therefore strongly imply that other phenomena are affecting their surface properties. The darkness of Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene is correlated with the fluxes of high-energy protons, implying that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
