Electron-impact single ionisation of W14+ ions: Subconfiguration-average and level-to-level distorted wave calculations
Fengtao Jin, Alexander Borovik Jr., Benjamin Ebinger, Stefan, Schippers

TL;DR
This study compares two theoretical approaches for calculating electron-impact ionisation cross sections of W14+ ions, finding that a hybrid method aligns well with experimental data near the ionisation threshold.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid SCADW and LLDW approach for more accurate ionisation cross section calculations of W14+ ions, especially near the threshold.
Findings
Hybrid approach agrees with experimental data near threshold.
Pure SCADW calculations deviate significantly from experiments.
The 4d->5d excitation-autoionisation channels are critical for accurate results.
Abstract
The cross section for electron-impact single ionisation of W14+ ions has been calculated by using two different approaches, i.e., the subconfiguration averaged distorted-wave (SCADW) method and the more involved level-to-level distorted-wave (LLDW) method. Both methods are found to yield very similar results except for the 4d->5d excitation-autoionisation (EA) channels that straddles the ionisation threshold. Accordingly, a hybrid theoretical cross section where the EA SCADW cross section is replaced by its LLDW counterpart is in good agreement with the experimental result from an electron-ion crossed-beams experiment. This is in contrast to pure SCADW calculations for W14+ and neighbouring charge states which exhibit significant deviations from the experimental near-threshold cross sections of Schury et al. [J. Phys. B 53 (2020) 015201].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
