Comparing the route-choice behavior of pedestrians around obstacles in a virtual experiment and a field study
Hongliu Li, Jun Zhang, Long Xia, Weiguo Song, Nikolai W.F. Bode

TL;DR
This study compares pedestrian route-choice behavior in virtual and real environments, showing virtual experiments can reliably replicate real-world decision-making in simple scenarios, based on factors like distance and pedestrian density.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that virtual experiments can validly simulate pedestrian route choices observed in real-world settings for simple scenarios.
Findings
Pedestrians prefer closer exit routes as distance difference increases.
Route choice is influenced by pedestrian density, with a preference for less used routes.
Over 74% of choices can be predicted by the studied factors.
Abstract
Pedestrians often need to decide between different routes they can use to reach their intended destinations, both during emergencies and in their daily lives. This route-choice behavior is important in determining traffic management, evacuation efficiency and building design. Here, we use field observations and a virtual experiment to study the route choice behavior of pedestrians around obstacles delimiting exit routes and examine the influence of three factors, namely the local distance to route starting points and the pedestrian density and walking speeds along routes. Crucially, both field study and virtual experiment consider the same scenario which allows us to directly assess the validity of testing pedestrian behavior in virtual environments. We find that in both data sets the proportion of people who choose a closer exit route increases as the difference in distance between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
