Comment on "Nonlocal Coherent Perfect Absorption"
Pablo L. Saldanha

TL;DR
This paper refutes previous claims of nonlocal coherent absorption in a specific setup, demonstrating that the observed absorption is actually local rather than nonlocal.
Contribution
It clarifies the nature of absorption in the setup, correcting prior misconceptions about nonlocal effects in lossy beam splitters.
Findings
No evidence of nonlocal coherent absorption in the considered setup
Absorption occurs locally at the lossy beam splitters
Previous claims of nonlocal effects are incorrect
Abstract
We show that, contrary to what is claimed in Ref. [J. Jeffers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143602 (2019)], there is no nonlocal coherent absorption by the two lossy beam splitters considered in detail in the treatment of the setup presented in this reference. What happens is a local coherent absorption by the other two lossy beam splitters of the setup.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum optics and atomic interactions
