Causality matters in medical imaging
Daniel C. Castro, Ian Walker, Ben Glocker

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of causality in medical imaging to address data scarcity and mismatch issues, influencing data collection, annotation, and learning strategies for safer, more reliable machine learning models.
Contribution
It introduces a causal perspective to medical imaging challenges, offering new insights into data annotation, model generalization, and learning strategy selection, with practical recommendations.
Findings
Causal relationships impact model performance and generalization.
Semi-supervision may be unsuitable for image segmentation.
Causality informs better data collection and annotation strategies.
Abstract
This article discusses how the language of causality can shed new light on the major challenges in machine learning for medical imaging: 1) data scarcity, which is the limited availability of high-quality annotations, and 2) data mismatch, whereby a trained algorithm may fail to generalize in clinical practice. Looking at these challenges through the lens of causality allows decisions about data collection, annotation procedures, and learning strategies to be made (and scrutinized) more transparently. We discuss how causal relationships between images and annotations can not only have profound effects on the performance of predictive models, but may even dictate which learning strategies should be considered in the first place. For example, we conclude that semi-supervision may be unsuitable for image segmentation---one of the possibly surprising insights from our causal analysis, which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
