Special groups, versality and the Grothendieck-Serre conjecture
Zinovy Reichstein, Dajano Tossici

TL;DR
This paper proves the equivalence of two definitions of special algebraic groups and proposes a strengthened Grothendieck-Serre conjecture using the concept of essential dimension.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of Serre's original and weaker definitions of special groups and introduces a generalized conjecture based on essential dimension.
Findings
Proved the equivalence of two definitions of special groups.
Generalized the Grothendieck-Serre conjecture.
Connected essential dimension with the concept of special groups.
Abstract
Let be a base field and be an algebraic group over . J.-P. Serre defined to be special if every -torsor is locally trivial in the Zariski topology for every reduced algebraic variety defined over . In recent papers an a priori weaker condition is used: is called special if every -torsor is split for every field containing . We show that these two definitions are equivalent. We also generalize this fact and propose a strengthened version of the Grothendieck-Serre conjecture based on the notion of essential dimension.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
