Gravitational-wave versus X-ray tests of strong-field gravity
Alejandro Cardenas-Avendano, Sourabh Nampalliwar, Nicolas Yunes

TL;DR
This paper compares how gravitational wave and X-ray observations can test strong-field gravity, finding that current GW data already provide tighter constraints than X-ray data, with future GW observations expected to surpass X-ray constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a model for constraining metric deviations using gravitational wave and X-ray data, and compares their effectiveness in testing strong-field gravity.
Findings
Current gravitational wave constraints are slightly better than X-ray constraints.
Future gravitational wave observations will significantly improve constraints.
GW observations at aLIGO design sensitivity will surpass future X-ray constraints.
Abstract
Electromagnetic observations of the radiation emitted by an accretion disk around a black hole, as well as gravitational wave observations of coalescing binaries, can be used to probe strong-field gravity. We here compare the constraints that these two types of observations can impose on theory-agnostic, parametric deviations from the Schwarzschild metric. On the gravitational wave side, we begin by computing the leading-order deviation to the Hamiltonian of a binary system in a quasi-circular orbit within the post-Newtonian approximation, given a parametric deformation of the Schwarzschild metrics of each binary component. We then compute the leading-order deviation to the gravitational waves emitted by such a binary in the frequency domain, assuming purely Einsteinian radiation-reaction. We compare this model to the LIGO-Virgo collaboration gravitational wave detections and place…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
